<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>This Much is True &#187; Musings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tinachaulk.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tinachaulk.com</link>
	<description>The cyber home of Tina Chaulk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sh*t Agents and Editors Say</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/31/sht-agents-and-editors-say/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/31/sht-agents-and-editors-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s lots of these going around but you know my ears perk up when it has anything to do with writing and publishing so here&#8217;s the latest (that I&#8217;ve seen) Sh*t such and such say. This time with extra funny for me.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s lots of these going around but you know my ears perk up when it has anything to do with writing and publishing so here&#8217;s the latest (that I&#8217;ve seen) Sh*t such and such say. This time with extra funny for me.</p>
<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3Gwhp3MuXXE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/31/sht-agents-and-editors-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Such Positive Comments on This  Blog</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/24/such-positive-comments-on-this-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/24/such-positive-comments-on-this-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must say, I am impressed with some of the comments I&#8217;ve been getting on this blog. And, surprisingly, these comments are not just on recent posts. No, people are commenting on posts that go back months and even years. And they are all so positive. They also seem to be translated from other languages, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, I am impressed with some of the comments I&#8217;ve been getting on this blog. And, surprisingly, these comments are not just on recent posts. No, people are commenting on posts that go back months and even years. <img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1112" title="thumbs ups" src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/thumbs-ups.jpg" alt="thumbs ups" width="251" height="201" />And they are all so positive. They also seem to be translated from other languages, using some pretty awful translation software. Okay, most of them mention other, perhaps seedy, websites and many of them discuss how to buy various pharmaceuticals or knock-off watches online. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that these are not people who genuinely love my blog. Allow me to share some examples.<br />
<span id="more-1108"></span><br />
Take this one, left on my post <a href=" http://tinachaulk.com/2007/04/24/writing-longhand/">Writing Longhand</a>, by someone who sells shoes online: &#8220;A lot of what you articulate is supprisingly legitimate and that makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light previously. This piece truly did switch the light on for me personally as far as this specific issue goes. Nevertheless there is one particular position I am not really too comfortable with and while I attempt to reconcile that with the actual core idea of your position, permit me observe exactly what the rest of your subscribers have to point out. Very well done.&#8221;</p>
<p>Surprisingly legitimate? You cannot pay for this kind of acclaim, I tell you.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the comment some kind online poker player left on my post, <a href="http://tinachaulk.com/2010/06/22/solutions-for-problems-installing-ios-4-for-ipod-touch-and-iphone/">Solutions for Problems Installing iOS 4 for iPod Touch and iPhone</a>: &#8220;I’ve learn several good stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how a lot effort you put to make any such great informative site.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, all my hard work has been noticed by someone pointing out the several good stuff here.</p>
<p>And some comments aren&#8217;t just about the posts. No, some have kindly given me fashion advice. Like this one, left on my <a href="http://tinachaulk.com/2010/08/03/creating-a-playlist-for-your-writing/">Creating a playlist for your writing</a> post:</p>
<p>&#8220;In relation to exhibiting off your persona by means of jewellery, most of the time you can generate a more substantial statement with a lot less. Pick out daring, dramatic items, but limit on your own to putting on a person or two at a time. A advanced pair of chandelier earrings can set off an outfit on it’s individual, and at times a flashy cocktail ring would be the only glitz you need to draw interest.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chandelier earrings and a flashy cocktail ring? Why I&#8217;m wearing them as I type this! And I do generally try to limit myself to put on only one or two persons at a time but, hey, sometimes I just can&#8217;t help myself.</p>
<p>Now, you might wonder why I posted these here instead of say, approving them in the comments of the very posts they were left for. Well, I try to stay humble about these things and have shared only a few of them here. I can&#8217;t go approving comments for all the kind people who find several good stuff here. That would just be too much. I&#8217;m not one to brag. Now, I have to go because typing while wearing this flashy cocktail ring is killing my hand. Please feel free to leave comments if you find this post surprisingly legitimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/24/such-positive-comments-on-this-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with myself: Impounding vehicles of impaired drivers</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/17/conversations-with-myself-impounding-vehicles-of-impaired-drivers/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/17/conversations-with-myself-impounding-vehicles-of-impaired-drivers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Perhaps) the first in a series of conversations with myself.
Myself: I heard a story on the radio this morning of a person being arrested for impaired driving last night. Sam guy was arrested for impaired driving twice in one day last month.That&#8217;s scary.
Me: &#8220;How is this kind of horrific stupidity allowed to occur?
Myself: What? How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Perhaps) the first in a series of conversations with myself.</p>
<p>Myself: I heard a story on the radio this morning of a person being arrested for impaired driving last night. Sam guy was arrested for impaired driving twice in one day last month.That&#8217;s scary.</p>
<p>Me: &#8220;How is this kind of horrific stupidity allowed to occur?</p>
<p>Myself: What? How can you say that? You know that this man obviously has a serious problem with alcohol and, as someone who worked in addictions for quite a while, you should know better than to call him &#8217;stupid&#8217;. He&#8217;s ill. He needs help.</p>
<p>I: No, she meant the horrific stupidity of a legal system that lets impaired people, and their vehicles, go free so then impaired drivers can have another shot at it. The man does need help and protection. From himself.<span id="more-1098"></span></p>
<p>Myself: Oh, okay. Yes, well, that&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Me: So they should impound the vehicle of anyone arrested for impaired driving.</p>
<p>I: Sure. I mean they impound vehicles that are parked illegally when it&#8217;s winter and the car is impeding snow clearing. And the same is true, I think, if a car is parked in a loading zone. That car is towed and you can&#8217;t get it back until you pay up.</p>
<p>Me: Exactly. Surely impounding the vehicle of a drunk driver is a perfectly sensible way to prevent that person from driving again, at least until he sobers up, for God&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>I: Now, calm down. Don&#8217;t get all riled up.</p>
<p>Me: But I am riled up. Really riled up. Pissed off, the truth be told. I do not understand why we don&#8217;t impound vehicles used in DUIs, for the safety of the public and the safety of impaired drivers themselves. If we made the cost to get the cars back more than it costs to get a few cab rides, maybe some lives could be saved. DUI offenders obviously can&#8217;t police themselves and taking away their licenses doesn&#8217;t work so you have to take the cars away.</p>
<p>Myself: But what if the impaired driver is driving a vehicle that belongs to someone else.</p>
<p>Me: Tough! If that person was uncaring and irresponsible enough to loan a car to someone who was intoxicated or has been repeatedly intoxicated while driving or could conceivably be intoxicated while driving the vehicle, then too bad.</p>
<p>I: I don&#8217;t think they care about who owns the car when they tow away the car parked on the side of the road and impeding snow clearing.</p>
<p>Me: True.</p>
<p>Myself: But that&#8217;s different. If the city can&#8217;t plow the roads, then people might be in danger. In that case impounding the vehicle is for public safety&#8230; Oh.</p>
<p>Me: Yeah, exactly. Public safety. Even you can&#8217;t argue with that.</p>
<p>I: Well, someone must be arguing against it or else we&#8217;d be impounding the vehicles.</p>
<p>Myself: I&#8217;m riled up now too. We should blog about this.</p>
<p>I: Okay but first you need some coffee. You know you&#8217;re not fit to be around until you get your coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/17/conversations-with-myself-impounding-vehicles-of-impaired-drivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging the Golden Globe Awards</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/15/blogging-the-golden-globe-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/15/blogging-the-golden-globe-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Golden Globe red carpet summary: Lots of pale colours; pretty much everyone looked great; Angelina looked like a walking, talking Barbie doll; Madonna looked like someone had given her a new face and sounded like she&#8217;d been given a new accent; Kelly Osbourne had old lady blue hair, seemingly on purpose; and some woman actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golden Globe red carpet summary: Lots of pale colours; pretty much everyone looked great; Angelina looked like a walking, talking Barbie doll; Madonna looked like someone had given her a new face and sounded like she&#8217;d been given a new accent; Kelly Osbourne had old lady blue hair, seemingly on purpose; and some woman actually bragged about the &#8220;laser-cut swans&#8221; in her dress. Now, let&#8217;s let Ricky Gervais go at them all!</p>
<p>Seriously, how fabulous is Ricky Gervais? </p>
<p>Christopher Plummer has been married for 43 years. That&#8217;s like 764 in Hollywood years. </p>
<p>The eyes of that woman on the screen are saying, &#8220;get your greasy paws off me, Jeremy Irons&#8221;.</p>
<p>Looked like Elton John gave Madonna the stinkeye. I bet he was thinking, &#8220;she took my award AND my accent&#8221;. </p>
<p>Loved Felicity Huffman and William Macy doing harmony to sing the intro to the award they were presenting.</p>
<p>Tina Fey and Jane Lynch: two of the funniest women on TV making the funny perfectly. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m missing something important on the Golden Globes. Can&#8217;t quite place it. Wait, oh yes, the host! Rickygervais where are you?</p>
<p>Morgan Freeman is so awesome. I still always think of him as the guy from The Electric Company, though. Now, that&#8217;s dating myself.</p>
<p>My, these awards, given out to by The Foreign Press Association, sure end up going to a lot of people who aren&#8217;t American. And Meryl Streep and George Clooney, of course. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/15/blogging-the-golden-globe-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I Want to See in 2012 – Episode 2</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/10/what-i-want-to-see-in-2012-%e2%80%93-episode-2/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/10/what-i-want-to-see-in-2012-%e2%80%93-episode-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of what I&#8217;d like to see in 2012
Less Plastic Surgery and More Wrinkles 
Seriously, there are so many actors and actresses now that make me cringe when I look at them because of their altered faces. Not just facelifts that make them look like they&#8217;ve been in a cartoon windstorm and their face stayed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of what I&#8217;d like to see in 2012</p>
<p><strong>Less Plastic Surgery and More Wrinkles </strong><br />
Seriously, there are so many actors and actresses now that make me cringe when I look at them because of their altered faces. Not just facelifts that make them look like they&#8217;ve been in a cartoon windstorm and their face stayed that way, but Botox where nothing moves and eye jobs where eyes start to look more like the eyes I draw when I create portraits (AKA stick figures)&#8211;just holes in a face with no actual eye shape. Lips that are permanently puckered, like they&#8217;re always waiting for the kiss that never comes. They actually call <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/beauty/article-1243038/Plump-pout-Bee-stung-lips-make-women-younger-say-scientists-heres-look-swell-.html">them &#8216;bee-stung lips&#8217; and they get them sometimes by injecting fat from their thighs or stomachs</a>. I guess for people who inject botulism into their skin, lips that emulate being attacked by an insect is a great idea.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://pigtimes.com/cartoons/plastic-surgery-cartoons/"><img src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cartoons_cosmetic_surgery-550x548-300x298.jpg" alt="cartoons_cosmetic_surgery-550x548" title="cartoons_cosmetic_surgery-550x548" width="300" height="298" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1082" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-1061"></span></p>
<p>Obviously there are good plastic surgeons out there because all the worked on faces don&#8217;t look like a horror movie gone wrong. There are people who are eighty and look forty who, when they look into the camera during an interview and say &#8220;I haven&#8217;t had any work done&#8221;, you can&#8217;t come right back and say, &#8220;well, why are your ears so incredibly close to your eyes?&#8221;. Those people are lucky to have gotten a good surgeon and to not have gone batshit crazy with the plastic surgeries. But even those people are annoying because they just can&#8217;t look that good at that age. NO ONE BELIEVES YOU DIDN&#8217;T HAVE WORK DONE! Own up to it, for God&#8217;s sake. I don&#8217;t care what creams and peels you use, it&#8217;s not possible (unless you&#8217;re African American because the phrase&#8211;and I sincerely hope this is not an offensive phrase because it is truly only used as a compliment mixed with a lot of envy&#8211;&#8217;black don&#8217;t crack&#8217; appears true).</p>
<p>I would like to see people on TV and in movies with wrinkles.  I would like for, say, someone who is playing a grandmother, to look older than her grandchild. I would like people to blink and raise their eyebrows and smile, you know, have facial expressions. A scowl! My God, a scowl would be great. Let&#8217;s go for that crazy trend in 2012.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>More of Once Upon a Time</strong></p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Rga4rp4j5TY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Oh my. I love this show on ABC. And I didn&#8217;t expect to. I&#8217;m not a big fan of fantasy or fairy tales but this is awesome on so many levels. Basically, it&#8217;s the story of the story book world and all its characters brought into the real world through the curse of Snow White&#8217;s evil stepmother. None of the cursed people know they&#8217;re really from storybooks (well, almost none). But one boy in the town where all these characters live, found a book that tells the true story. The stories of the characters as people in fairy tales are mixed through flashbacks with the stories of the people in the town during present day. There is a battle brewing and the evil queen (the mayor in the present day real town) has met her match in the biological mother of the boy who found the book. Played by Jennifer Morrison (Cameron of Fox&#8217;s House M.D.), Emma Swan is tied into this whole tale. We know pretty early on how she&#8217;s connected but I don&#8217;t want to ruin it for you. It&#8217;s such a suspenseful, fascinating mix of reality and fantasy where good is really good and evil is really evil. And with the kind of connections and twists I love.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Iron Lady<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Meryl Streep as Margaret Thatcher. Isn&#8217;t that brilliant? Do I even need to say more?<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IKPltuiEVJ8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Less Hipsters</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest. I don&#8217;t know what a hipster is but I hear a lot about them and the whole thing gets on my nerves. And that&#8217;s reason enough for me to want to less of it all. <a href="http://www.cracked.com/funny-4573-hipster/">Cracked has some great things to say about them. </a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for what I want to see in 2012. At least the fluffy, unimportant stuff. There&#8217;s lots more I want to see in 2012 like world peace, a cure (or at least a treatment or vaccine for) cancer and other terrible diseases, the occupy movement to lead to real change, more jobs, less poverty, and a more healthy environment, to name but a few. I&#8217;d take all the Kardashians and facelifts you could throw at me in exchange for those things. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/10/what-i-want-to-see-in-2012-%e2%80%93-episode-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I Want to See in 2012 &#8211; Episode 1</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/03/what-i-want-to-see-in-2012-episode-1/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/03/what-i-want-to-see-in-2012-episode-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are some of the things I want to see in 2012:
The new season  of Republic of Doyle

If you&#8217;re not a Newfoundlander, Republic of Doyle is a great television show filled with action, humour and thrills about a PI named Jake Doyle and the mysteries he solves with his father. If you are from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some of the things I want to see in 2012:</p>
<p><strong>The new season  of Republic of Doyle</strong></p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GsSeXc7R3AA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not a Newfoundlander, Republic of Doyle is a great television show filled with action, humour and thrills about a PI named Jake Doyle and the mysteries he solves with his father. If you are from Newfoundland, Doyle is all that, a bag of chips, and loaded with inside humour that make it just a teensy bit more enjoyable for us than the rest of the world. We love Doyle.</p>
<p>Republic of Doyle is so much a part of our pride and culture that it <span id="more-1045"></span>seems things revolve around it. No sense trying to get someone to go for a coffee or a movie on a Wednesday night. And no good suggesting you record it because there&#8217;s something about being there when the joke is first told on the screen or the shirt first hauled off, that makes it better. I was recently at a gathering where a woman said she&#8217;d never watched Republic of Doyle. The room became silent and people looked at her like she said she ate baby poop for breakfast. A Newfoundlander saying she doesn&#8217;t watch Republic of Doyle is sort of like a six-year-old girl saying &#8220;Justin Beiber sucks&#8221;. It just seems wrong.</p>
<p>Even more exciting about the upcoming season is Russell Crowe (yes, that Russell Crowe) guest starring in the season premiere. I like him, not just because he is a huge movie star but because he &#8220;gets&#8221; Newfoundland and Labrador and likes the place and the people. Also, he&#8217;s a fabulous actor. He&#8217;s got the Oscar to prove it but maybe you missed one of my favourite movies of his,<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0473705/"> State of Play</a>. I think it was highly underrated. You should check it out if you get a chance. It&#8217;s a political thriller in which he plays an investigative journalist and it includes music from our own <a href="http://www.greatbigsea.com/">Great Big Sea</a> (their lead singer, Alan Doyle, is also guest starring on the premiere of Doyle and, of course, GBS plays the show&#8217;s theme song).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to the premiere of Republic of Doyle, starring Allan Hawco, on January 11 on CBC. You should too!</p>
<p><strong>The end of the Kardashians</strong></p>
<p>Okay, I don&#8217;t really mean the end as in I want them all dead. That wouldn&#8217;t be nice. But I would like the end of the obsession people seem to have with them. And when I say, &#8220;people&#8221;, I don&#8217;t really know who I mean. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever heard anyone say they like the Kardashians or care about what they&#8217;re doing. But Kardashians seemingly have seventeen thousand television shows and are on the cover of every magazine. Seriously. I just googled &#8220;Kardashian cover&#8221;" and got over 99 million image results. It&#8217;s truly nauseating. One of them got married and then quickly divorced this summer, which meant I was exposed to all kinds of &#8220;news&#8221; stories about it and articles and videos and tweets until I felt like I was somehow being punished for something I&#8217;d done in a past life. Karma Kardashian, I think she was called. (And while I&#8217;m at it, I think such ridiculous examples of marriage as that one really makes me question how people can say that gay marriage would somehow take away from the sanctity of marriage. I&#8217;d say any of these fly-by-night, media frenzied celebrity marriages have done far more to hurt any such sanctity than the joining of two people of the same sex who love each other. Puhleeze.) Anyway, I&#8217;d just like for the great &#8220;they&#8221; that is popular culture to snap out of this weird Kardashian love and let them go the way of other cultural icons like, say, Paris Hilton who I thankfully don&#8217;t hear much about anymore.</p>
<p><strong>A new Nick Hornby book</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s a new <a href="http://www.penguin.co.uk/static/cs/uk/0/minisites/nickhornby/index.html">Nick Hornby </a>book coming out but it is something I&#8217;d like to see in 2012. Hey, I can dream, right?</p>
<p><strong>Facebook to give it up already</strong></p>
<p>I am hooked on facebook but they change things too much. Now, they&#8217;ve got <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/beware-facebook-timeline-theres-no-going-back-16202898/">timeline </a>coming and it looks just awful to me. So, I would love, love, love if facebook would just leave well enough alone.</p>
<p><strong>Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.tompetty.com/">They&#8217;re coming here in June </a>and hubby and I have tickets. We haven&#8217;t been to a concert in years but this is one I&#8217;m really looking forward to.</p>
<p>More of what I want to see in 2012 in Episode 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/03/what-i-want-to-see-in-2012-episode-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 The Year of More Blogging</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/01/2012-the-year-of-more-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/01/2012-the-year-of-more-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have let this poor little blog down. It used to feel loved, attended to, even nurtured. It used to be the place I dropped my thoughts, rants, pictures, a link to video, some humour, or a bit of advice. Now, let&#8217;s face it, I use twitter and facebook for those things. But it&#8217;s not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have let this poor little blog down. It used to feel loved, attended to, even nurtured. It used to be the place I dropped my thoughts, rants, pictures, a link to video, some humour, or a bit of advice. Now, let&#8217;s face it, I use twitter and facebook for those things. But it&#8217;s not the blog&#8217;s fault. It&#8217;s been a perfectly good little blog to me. So I need to change for it. Everyone knows that when you get into the habit of doing something, you do it more often so I must get back into the habit of blogging. For me, that means a realistic goal.</p>
<p>My goal could just be more blogging but look through this blog and you&#8217;ll see such empty promises scattered amongst the posts. No, I need something more concrete but also realistic. So, I&#8217;ll say once a week at least. And that&#8217;s really no good for a blogging slackard like me so I need something more  regular. Let&#8217;s say&#8230;.every Tuesday. Yeah, a new blog post every Tuesday, at the very least. I can do that. I resolve to post every Tuesday, at least.</p>
<p>There. I already posted one this year. And it&#8217;s not even Tuesday yet! I&#8217;m getting better already. See you on Tuesday. Or with a really good excuse on Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2012/01/01/2012-the-year-of-more-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Privacy Issues</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/09/26/facebook-privacy-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/09/26/facebook-privacy-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, let&#8217;s face it, we&#8217;re all pretty tired of facebook changing things and making it hard to keep the things we post private but this last round of changes has really taken the cake. With this new ticker feature scrolling on the side of the screen all the time, I can see things about people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, let&#8217;s face it, we&#8217;re all pretty tired of facebook changing things and making it hard to keep the things we post private but this last round of changes has really taken the cake. With this new ticker feature scrolling on the side of the screen all the time, I can see things about people I don&#8217;t even know about. From my facebook ticker, I can see things like &#8220;X commented on Y&#8217;s Post on Z&#8217;s Wall:&#8221; and I only know X. Not a clue who Y and Z are but somehow I&#8217;ve been dragged into a conversation between them because X chose to make a comment and facebook&#8217;s algorithm thinks I should know it. FYI, I do not care!</p>
<p>Now, I know that this won&#8217;t matter a bit in most cases, but there are cases where it could. Maybe I don&#8217;t want to know that my Aunt Fanny commented &#8220;ooh, love those hot buns&#8221; on some woman&#8217;s photo of a Chippendale dancer. And I sure don&#8217;t want my boss to know that I Liked the candidate his friend is running against in the next election. Ensuring our privacy on facebook can be pretty important. So, how to do it?</p>
<p>First, set your default privacy to Friends. Not friends of friends because you don&#8217;t know who they are, do ya?</p>
<p>Go to the upper right corner in facebook, next to your name and the word, Home and click on the arrow. Then Privacy Settings.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-988" title="facebook_privacy" src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/facebook_privacy.png" alt="facebook_privacy" width="244" height="168" /></p>
<p><span id="more-987"></span><br />
Then choose Friends as your default setting. Note the three types of icons for Public, Friends, and Custom. They&#8217;ll be important in a minute.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-994" title="Facebook_friends" src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Facebook_friends1.png" alt="Facebook_friends" width="470" height="189" /></p>
<p>If you choose Custom, you can choose specific groups and people or choose the seemingly innocuous Friends of friends. You think maybe that&#8217;s not so bad, right? Friends of friends. But do you know how discerning your facebook friends are in choosing who their friends are? What of the people who have several hundred or even over a thousand friends? Think about it.</p>
<p>Now you&#8217;ve done your part. But you can&#8217;t control what others do, of course, so you have to take some personal responsibility now when you post comments or &#8220;Like&#8221; someone&#8217;s post, photo, video, or link. So before you make a comment you might not want public or &#8220;Like&#8221; a photo of your ex-boyfriend&#8217;s new tattoo, check the settings on that post, picture, or video. In the bottom right of that post there will be a little icon of people or a globe or a gear. A gear may mean it is set to Friends of friends. Hover your mouse over the icon to see exactly what that post is set at. Is it public? Will it go out to friends of friends? Well, your comment will be too, <strong>as far as I know</strong>.  Now, consider whether you want to make that comment or not. Do you really want your facebook friend&#8217;s eighth-grade classmate to see your comment? Think before you post.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-992" title="facebook_friends_of_friends" src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/facebook_friends_of_friends.png" alt="facebook_friends_of_friends" width="499" height="99" /></p>
<p>There are other things you can do like make lists but I&#8217;m just sharing some basic stuff here that <strong>I think to be true</strong>. It seems everyone has different ideas about this privacy stuff and I don&#8217;t think facebook has made it nearly clear enough, nor simple enough, for us to know exactly what each setting does. So tread carefully while I go check out that picture my Aunt Fanny liked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/09/26/facebook-privacy-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breakwater Facebook Book Giveaway</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/08/10/breakwater-facebook-book-giveaway/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/08/10/breakwater-facebook-book-giveaway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My publisher, Breakwater Books, has a contest on facebook giving away copies of both my novels. Check it out on facebook.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My publisher, <a href="http://www.breakwaterbooks.com/" target="_blank">Breakwater Books</a>, has a contest on facebook giving away copies of both my novels. Check it out <a href="http://www.facebook.com/?ref=logo#!/photo.php?fbid=10150260592892507&amp;set=a.382015507506.161418.29596022506&amp;type=1&amp;theater" target="_blank">on facebook</a>.</p>
<p><center><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-982" title="tina_books" src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/tina_books.jpg" alt="tina_books" width="420" height="298" /></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/08/10/breakwater-facebook-book-giveaway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggity blog and Never Eat a Dinosaur</title>
		<link>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/05/24/bloggity-blog-and-never-eat-a-dinosaur/</link>
		<comments>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/05/24/bloggity-blog-and-never-eat-a-dinosaur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 19:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tchaulk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tinachaulk.com/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two things (I am not going to do the obligatory bad blogger post although I know I really, really, really deserve it):

I know I haven&#8217;t been posting much lately (damn, I did it anyway!) but mostly it&#8217;s because I haven&#8217;t had the time to take away from my life and other writing to write long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things (I am not going to do the obligatory bad blogger post although I know I really, really, really deserve it):</p>
<ol>
<li>I know I haven&#8217;t been posting much lately (damn, I did it anyway!) but mostly it&#8217;s because I haven&#8217;t had the time to take away from my life and other writing to write long posts, and because facebook and twitter provide me with other places to say things I want to say. I always think of blog posts as long, well thought out things and the thought sometimes is overwhelming but I&#8217;ve decided that it&#8217;s okay to post shorter things here too so that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ll be doing more of. Still some longer posts sometimes but I&#8217;m giving myself the option of putting shorter posts here when I want.</li>
<li>I have a new blog I&#8217;ve started called Never Eat a Dinosaur. You can find it, conveniently enough, at <a href="http://nevereatadinosaur.com/" target="_blank">nevereatadinosaur.com</a>. It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been thinking about doing for a long time now. Many times I find myself saying something, usually to my three-year-old, and think, <em>how did I, a relatively normal, not horribly unintelligent human being, just say that</em>? Things like &#8220;never eat a dinosaur&#8221; or &#8220;don&#8217;t put that plane in your ear&#8221; and I always think I should make a blog about saying such things. So I did.<br />
<center><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-976" title="dino_header" src="http://tinachaulk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/dino_header1.jpg" alt="dino_header" width="406" height="97" /></center>I&#8217;d love for you to check it out, maybe laugh, hopefully submit your own Never Eat a Dinosaur moment, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Never-Eat-A-Dinosaur/193723524003179" target="_blank">like the site on facebook</a>, and/or <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/nevereatadino" target="_blank">follow it on twitter</a>. So come join in the fun. I have a contest going on this month and there&#8217;s<a href="http://nevereatadinosaur.com/contest/" target="_blank"> a bunch of ways you can enter to win a great gift certificate</a>.You know I always love to hear from you whether it&#8217;s here, via  <a href="mailto:tchaulk@gmail.com">email</a>, or at Never Eat a Dinosaur.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tinachaulk.com/2011/05/24/bloggity-blog-and-never-eat-a-dinosaur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

